At a Glance: The Verdict
| Garmin Forerunner 265 | Coros Pace 3 |
|---|---|
|
Best For: Runners who want a bright AMOLED screen, Garmin Pay, and the full Garmin Connect ecosystem. A vibrant, feature-rich training partner with multi-band GPS, contactless payments, and the deepest training analytics in the sub-$500 tier. |
Best For: Budget-focused runners who want the longest battery life and the lightest wrist feel. A featherweight 30g multi-band GPS watch that costs half as much as the Garmin and still outlasts it on a single charge. |
Quick Buy Path
Check today’s pricing before you go deeper.
If these are already your two finalists, compare current pricing now, then keep reading for the full verdict.
The Garmin Forerunner 265 and the Coros Pace 3 both target serious runners, but they chase very different buyers. One throws money at display tech and smart features; the other strips the watch down to the essentials and charges half the price.
Key Differences
- Display: Forerunner 265 uses a bright 1.3″ AMOLED; Pace 3 uses an always-on 1.2″ memory-in-pixel LCD.
- Price: Garmin launched at $449.99, Coros at $229 — a 2x price gap.
- Weight: Pace 3 is 30g, Forerunner 265 is 47g. That’s a 36% difference you feel on long runs.
- Battery in GPS mode: Pace 3 hits 38 hours; Forerunner 265 tops out at 20 hours.
- Contactless payments: Garmin Pay is built in on the 265; the Pace 3 has no NFC.
- Sensor suite: The 265 adds an ambient light sensor and SatIQ adaptive GPS; the Pace 3 keeps it lean.
- Storage: 8GB on the Garmin vs 4GB on the Coros — matters for offline music.
Deep Dive Comparison
Design & Comfort
Both watches use fiber-reinforced polymer cases and carry a 5 ATM water rating, so they’re effectively tied on durability. The real story is the weight. At 30g, the Pace 3 is one of the lightest GPS watches on the market and nearly disappears on a marathon. The 47g Forerunner 265 isn’t heavy by any means, but after 3+ hours it starts to register. The 265’s 46.1mm case is also a touch larger than the Pace 3’s 41.9mm, so smaller wrists will prefer the Coros.
Battery Life
This is the category where the cheaper watch wins outright. In everyday smartwatch mode, the Pace 3 lasts up to 15 days versus 13 days for the Forerunner 265. Push both into multi-band GPS and the Pace 3 nearly doubles the Garmin — 38 hours against 20. If you’re training for an ultra or just hate charging gear, the Coros is the safer pick.
Health & Fitness Features
Both watches ship with multi-band (dual-frequency) GPS, which delivers noticeably better accuracy than single-band watches in cities or under tree cover. Garmin’s SatIQ layer auto-switches between modes to stretch battery without obvious accuracy loss — a genuine advantage. Heart-rate sensing is competent on both, though Garmin’s Elevate sensor has a longer track record for interval work. Where the 265 pulls ahead is training analytics: Training Readiness, HRV Status, daily suggested workouts, and Race Predictor are more mature than anything Coros currently offers. Coros counters with a cleaner, faster-to-read workout UI and excellent track mode.
Smart Features
The Forerunner 265 is the clear smart-features winner. You get Garmin Pay for tap-to-pay at the finish line, 8GB of storage for Spotify/Amazon Music/Deezer offline playback, and full Connect IQ app support. The Pace 3 has 4GB of storage for offline music (MP3 sideloading only — no Spotify), no NFC payments, and a much thinner app ecosystem. Notifications work fine on both, but the AMOLED display on the Garmin makes them genuinely readable.
Price & Value
Launch prices tell the story: $449.99 for the Forerunner 265, $229 for the Pace 3. Street prices have softened both, but the Coros consistently undercuts the Garmin by roughly $200. If your budget is tight and you only care about accurate GPS, solid HR, and training data, the Pace 3 is the best value in running watches right now. If you want the nicer screen, payments, and Garmin’s deeper coaching, the 265 earns the premium — just barely.
Technical Specs
| Spec | Garmin Forerunner 265 | Coros Pace 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Launch Price | $449.99 | $229 |
| Weight | 47g | 30g |
| Case Size | 46.1mm | 41.9mm |
| Display | 1.3″ AMOLED, 416 x 416 | 1.2″ Memory LCD, 240 x 240 |
| Battery (Smartwatch) | Up to 13 days | Up to 15 days |
| Battery (GPS) | 20 hours | 38 hours |
| GPS | Multi-band + SatIQ | Multi-band |
| Water Rating | 5 ATM | 5 ATM |
| NFC Payments | Yes (Garmin Pay) | No |
| Storage | 8GB | 4GB |
| Connectivity | Bluetooth, ANT+, Wi-Fi | Bluetooth, Wi-Fi |
The Verdict
The Coros Pace 3 wins this matchup on raw value. It’s lighter, lasts longer, has the same multi-band GPS, and costs about $220 less. For most runners — especially anyone training for a marathon or ultra — that’s the smart buy.
Buy the Garmin Forerunner 265 if you specifically want the AMOLED display, Garmin Pay, Spotify offline playback, or Garmin’s Training Readiness and HRV Status metrics. Those features are real and genuinely useful, but you’re paying a steep premium for them.
Buy the Coros Pace 3 if you want the best pure running watch under $250 and don’t need contactless payments or a flashy screen. For 90% of runners, this is the right answer.
🏆 Ready to Decide?
Check the latest deals to see which one fits your budget.
*We earn a commission if you make a purchase.
Specs and features may change. Always verify details on the manufacturer’s official site before purchasing.
